THIS QUESTION HAS 3 PARTS MUST ANSWER ALL. READ FULL DESCRIPTION.

THIS QUESTION HAS 3 PARTS MUST ANSWER ALL. READ FULL DESCRIPTION.

Part 1 of paper: How and why was Uruguay able to legalize marijuana, and how was Norway able to revolutionize its incarceration system, and how was EU/Sweden able to take a more proactive approach to climate change?
– This must be 1/3 of paper
– use sources i listed down below

Part 2 of paper: Pick one of the country issue pairs.. for example (Uruguay/marijuana, drug prohibition; Norway/Incarceration; EU and/or Sweden / Climate Change), and discuss the one or two democratic categories which most explain WHY this country was able to achieve these policy interventions.
Must be 1/3 of paper
– use sources i listed down below at end of description
– THESE ARE THE DEMOCRATIC CATEGORIES YOU MUST CHOOSE FROM ONLY.
– You are choosing 1-2 of the democratic categories we have been discussing all semester:
o Competition: Leadership
o Competition: System of Government
o Competition: Political Parties / Social Movements
o Justice: Negative Rights
o Justice: Positive Rights
o Participation: Election Rules, Protest
o Participation: Influence of international forces and/or lobbyists

Part 3 of Paper: Given your analysis, what can the US learn from these policy innovations? What are the parts of this policy that the US might be able to adapt and how might this adaptation look [hint: talk about whether the US will adapt these policies at the federal or state level]. What are the obstacles to adapting these policies?
Must be 1/3 of paper
– You can use outside sources for part 3 of paper 3-5 max.

****MUST CITE ALL SOURCES USING APA FORMAT. ALSO MUST USE THE SOURCES I PROVIDE YOU. YOU CAN USE OUTSIDE SOURCES FOR PART 3 OF THE PAPER BUT ONLY 3-5 OUTSIDE SOURCES FOR PART 3 OF THE PAPER MAX. PART 1 AND 2 MUST USE SOURCES I PROVIDE.****