This is essay is worth 60% of my total grade. It is a political philosophy essay i have attached some of the reading lists and i am also going to attached the lecture slides please kindly go through them and use the lecture slides as a guideline to answer the essay question.
Daniel Butt (2009), Compensation for Historical International Injustice, Chapter 4 of his Rectifying International Injustice, (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 97-134 OR
Daniel Butt (2007) On Benefiting from Injustice, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 37 (1):129-152.
Further Reading
Robert Amdur (1979), Compensatory Justice: The Question of Costs, Political Theory, 7 (2):229-244.
Daniel Butt (2009), Rectifying International Injustice, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Daniel Butt (2006), Nations, Overlapping Generations and Historic Injustice, American Philosophical Quarterly, 43 (4):357-367.
Robert Fullinwinder (1975), Preferential Hiring and Compensation, Social Theory and Practice, 3 (3):307-320.
Thomas Hill (1991), The Message of Affirmative Action, Social Philosophy and Policy, 8 (2):108-129.
Saladin Meckled-Garcia (2008), On the Very Idea of Cosmopolitan Justice: Constructivism and International Agency, Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (3):245-271.
David Miller (2007), National Responsibility and Global Justice, (Oxford: Oxford University Press), especially Chapters 4 and 9.
Alasia Nuti (2019), Injustice and the Reproduction of History: Structural Inequalities, Gender and Redress (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), especially Chapters 2, 3, 8 and 9.
Edward Page (2012), Give It up for Climate Change: A Defence of the Beneficiary Pays Principle, International Theory 4 (2):300-330.
Edward Page and Avia Pasternak (eds.) (2014), Special Issue: Benefiting from Injustice, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 31 (4).
Thomas Pogge (2005), Real World Justice, Journal of Ethics, 9(1/2):29-53.
George Sher (1975), Justifying Reserve Discrimination in Employment, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 4 (2):159-170.
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1973), Preferential Hiring, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2 (4):364-384.
Iris Marion Young (2006), Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model, Social Philosophy and Policy, 23 (1):102-130.
Iris Marion Young (2011), A Social Connection Model, Chapter 4 of her Responsibility for Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 95-122.Required Reading
Christian Barry (2005), Understanding and Evaluating the Contribution Principle, in Andreas Follesdal and Thomas Pogge (eds.) Real World Justice, (Dordrecht: Springer), 103-138.
Further Reading
Elizabeth Ashford (2006), The Inadequacy of our Traditional Conception of the Duties Imposed by Human Rights, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 19 (2):217-235.
Christian Barry (2005), Applying the Contribution Principle, Metaphilosophy, 36 (1/2):210-225.
Elizabeth Cripps (2013), Doing and Preventing Harm, Chapter 3 in her Climate Change and the Moral Agent, (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 58-82.
Robert Jubb (2012), Contribution to Collective Harms and Responsibility, Ethical Perspectives, 19 (4):733-764.
Saladin Meckled-Garcia (2008), On the Very Idea of Cosmopolitan Justice: Constructivism and International Agency, Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (3):245-271.
David Miller (2007), National Responsibility and Global Justice, (Oxford: Oxford University Press), especially Chapters 4 and 9.
Alasia Nuti (2019), Injustice and the Reproduction of History: Structural Inequalities, Gender and Redress (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), especially Chapters 2, 3, 8 and 9.
Julio Montero (2008) Global Deprivation – Whose Duties? Some Problems with the Contribution Principle, Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):612-620.
Thomas Pogge (2005), Real World Justice, Journal of Ethics, 9(1/2):29-53.
Avia Pasternak (2010), Sharing the Cost of Political Injustices, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 10 (2):188-210.
Henry Shue (1993), Subsistence Emissions and Luxury Emissions, Law and Policy, 15 (1):39-60. Also in Stephen Gardiner et al (2010), Climate Ethics: Essential Readings (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 200-214.
Iris Marion Young (2006), Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model, Social Philosophy and Policy, 23 (1):102-130.
Iris Marion Young (2009), Responsibility for Justice, (Oxford: Oxford University Press), especially Chapter 4.Avia Pasternak (2013), Limiting States’ Corporate Responsibility, Journal of Political Philosophy, 21 (4): 361-381.
Anna Stilz (2011), Collective Responsibility and the State, Journal of Political Philosophy, 19 (2):190-208.
Further Reading
Farid Abdel-Nour, (2003), National responsibility, Political Theory, 31 (5): 693–719.
Louis-Philippe Hodgson (2012), Why the Basic Structure, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 42 (3/4):303-334.
Robert Jubb (2012), Contribution to Collective Harms and Responsibility, Ethical Perspectives, 19 (4):733-764.
Robert Jubb (2014), Citizens’ Participation in and Responsibility for State Injustices, Social Theory and Practice 40 (1):51-72.
Christopher Kutz (2000), Complicity, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), especially chapters 3, 4 and 5.
Christopher Kutz (2002), The Collective Work of Citizenship, Legal Theory, 8:471-494.
David Miller (2004), Holding Nations Responsible, Ethics 114 (2):240-268.
David Miller (2007), National Responsibility, Chapter 5 of his National Responsibility and Global Justice, (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 111-135.
John M. Parrish (2009), Collective Responsibility and the State, International Theory, 1 (1):119-154.
Avia Pasternak (2011), The Collective Responsibility of Democratic Publics, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 41 (1):99-124.
Thomas Pogge (2005), Real World Justice, Journal of Ethics, 9(1/2):29-53.
Andrea Sangiovanni (2007), Global Justice, Reciprocity, and the State, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 35 (1):3-39.
Iris Marion Young (2006), Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model, Social Philosophy and Policy, 23 (1):102-130.
Iris Marion Young (2009), Responsibility for Justice, (Oxford: Oxford University Press), especially Chapters 4, 5, and 6.
Our Advantages
Plagiarism Free Papers
All our papers are original and written from scratch. We will email you a plagiarism report alongside your completed paper once done.
Free Revisions
All papers are submitted ahead of time. We do this to allow you time to point out any area you would need revision on, and help you for free.
Title-page
A title page preceeds all your paper content. Here, you put all your personal information and this we give out for free.
Bibliography
Without a reference/bibliography page, any academic paper is incomplete and doesnt qualify for grading. We also offer this for free.
Originality & Security
At Homework Sharks, we take confidentiality seriously and all your personal information is stored safely and do not share it with third parties for any reasons whatsoever. Our work is original and we send plagiarism reports alongside every paper.
24/7 Customer Support
Our agents are online 24/7. Feel free to contact us through email or talk to our live agents.
Try it now!
How it works?
Follow these simple steps to get your paper done
Place your order
Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.
Proceed with the payment
Choose the payment system that suits you most.
Receive the final file
Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.
Our Services
We work around the clock to see best customer experience.
Pricing
Our prces are pocket friendly and you can do partial payments. When that is not enough, we have a free enquiry service.
Communication
Admission help & Client-Writer Contact
When you need to elaborate something further to your writer, we provide that button.
Deadlines
Paper Submission
We take deadlines seriously and our papers are submitted ahead of time. We are happy to assist you in case of any adjustments needed.
Reviews
Customer Feedback
Your feedback, good or bad is of great concern to us and we take it very seriously. We are, therefore, constantly adjusting our policies to ensure best customer/writer experience.