Children autonomy

Make sure that the paper is written as perfectly as possible. NO grammar error and NO PLAGIARISM.  – Expend paragraphs by adding specific examples to support each claim.  – Add real-world examples of children showing the ability to have full autonomy by doing things that are classified as “adult actions.” In the opposing view paragraph, add an example of why someone might say their child cannot have full autonomy. – Write a conclusion that summarizes everything but comes back to the point that children can have full autonomy. The total paper should be 4 pages. As FEW sources as possibles, but make sure to cite anything that came from an outside source.  KEEP IN MIND : Develop a philosophy paper from a Four Sentences paper. Each of the 4 sentences from the FSP into a full page—that is, you are to develop the introduction (with a view you oppose), the thesis—now including a short argument for the thesis, the objection to your thesis, and your response to the objection. The Four Sentence paper is : “ They say that children do not have full autonomy. I say that some children have full autonomy because age does not equal autonomy. One might object that children can have full autonomy because they are not fully developed. I reply that a child with a high level of maturity and understanding might have full autonomy.” Also important: You need to disambiguate two meanings of “children.” Children1 is any human under the age of 18. Children2 is any human being who is not mature enough to make all of its choices for itself. You are right that Child1 need not be the same as Child2. For our purposes, when we talk of acting paternalistically correctly toward children (so not letting them choose on their own) we are talking of Children2, not Children1.