To Review or Not to Review? – The primary goal of this weekly summative assignment is to explore and a

Purpose: The primary goal of this weekly summative assignment is to explore and analyze some of the major politically influenced processes and activities of the U.S. government.

Prepare: Review Chapters 8 to 10 in the course text, and read through the web page Supreme Court Landmarks
(Links to an external site.)
.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
To Review or Not to Review? – The primary goal of this weekly summative assignment is to explore and a
Get an essay WRITTEN FOR YOU, Plagiarism free, and by an EXPERT!
Order Essay

Reflect: One of the most essential characteristics of the U.S. government is the ability of the judicial branch to conduct reviews of laws, policies, and legislation at all levels. Judicial reviews have had an enormous impact on the history of this nation and on many other nations that have allowed this process to occur unimpeded. The impact of Marbury v. Madison (1803), the first judicial review conducted by the U.S. Supreme Court, still resonates throughout the United States and the world. Understanding how judicial review can affect a country is essential to understanding this core political feature of government.

Write: In your essay of at least three pages, you will first visit this web page from the federal government, Supreme Course Landmarks
(Links to an external site.)
, and pick one landmark judicial review case. Then, you will address the following.:

Discuss the major political issues surrounding the case (1 page).
Explain why the issue ended up being reviewed for its constitutionality (1 page).
Assess whether judicial review should be used more often and the reasons behind your rationale (1 page).

The To Review or Not to Review? paper

Must be at least three pages (not including title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Style
(Links to an external site.)
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Must use at least three appropriate sources in addition to the course text.
Be sure to integrate the information from your sources rather than simply inserting it. Watch the Integrating Research
(Links to an external site.)
tutorial for assistance.
The assigned web page, Supreme Course Landmarks
(Links to an external site.)
, will count as one of your three sources.
You can also include additional resources found on the Library website. The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources
(Links to an external site.)
table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types.
Must document all sources in APA Style as outlined in Citing Within Your Paper
(Links to an external site.)
.
Must include an introductory paragraph with a succinct thesis statement.
Must include a conclusion that summarizes the main points and restates the thesis.
For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions
(Links to an external site.)
as well as Writing a Thesis Statement
(Links to an external site.)
, refer to the Ashford University Writing Center resources.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style
Organization: Introduction, Thesis Statement, and Conclusion
Total: 1.00

Distinguished – The paper is logically organized with a well-written introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion.

Proficient – The paper is logically organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. One of these requires improvement.

Basic – The paper is organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. One or more of the introduction, thesis statement, and/or conclusion require improvement.

Below Expectations – The paper is loosely organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. The introduction, thesis statement, and/or conclusion require much improvement.

Non-Performance – The organization, introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Discusses the Major Political Issues Surrounding a Landmark Judicial Review Case
Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively discusses the major political issues surrounding a landmark judicial review case, fully supporting the discussion with scholarly sources.

Proficient – Discusses the major political issues surrounding a landmark judicial review case, supporting the discussion with scholarly sources. The discussion is slightly underdeveloped or unclear.

Basic – Partially discusses the major political issues surrounding a landmark judicial review case, somewhat supporting the discussion with scholarly sources. The discussion is underdeveloped and/or unclear.

Below Expectations – Attempts to discuss the major political issues surrounding a landmark judicial review case; however, the discussion is not supported with scholarly sources and/or is significantly underdeveloped and unclear.

Non-Performance – The discussion of the major political issues surrounding a landmark judicial review case is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Explains Why a Landmark Judicial Review Case Ended Up Being Reviewed for Its Constitutionality
Total: 2.00

Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively explains why a landmark judicial review case ended up being reviewed for its constitutionality, fully supporting the explanation with scholarly sources.

Proficient – Explains why a landmark judicial review case ended up being reviewed for its constitutionality, supporting the explanation with scholarly sources. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped or unclear.

Basic – Partially explains why a landmark judicial review case ended up being reviewed for its constitutionality, somewhat supporting the explanation with scholarly sources. The explanation is underdeveloped and/or unclear.

Below Expectations – Attempts to explain why a landmark judicial review case ended up being reviewed for its constitutionality; however, the explanation is not supported with scholarly sources and/or is significantly underdeveloped and unclear.

Non-Performance – The explanation of why a landmark judicial review case ended up being reviewed for its constitutionality is either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Assesses whether Judicial Review Should be Used More Often
Total: 2.00

Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively assesses whether judicial review should be used more often, fully supporting the assessment with scholarly sources.

Proficient – Assesses whether judicial review should be used more often, supporting the assessment with scholarly sources. The assessment is slightly underdeveloped or unclear.

Basic – Partially assesses whether judicial review should be used more often, somewhat supporting the assessment with scholarly sources. The assessment is underdeveloped and/or unclear.

Below Expectations – Attempts to assess whether judicial review should be used more often; however, the assessment is not supported with scholarly sources and/or is significantly underdeveloped and unclear.

Non-Performance – The assessment of whether judicial review should be used more often was either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Written Communication: Content Development
Total: 0.50

Distinguished – Uses appropriate, pertinent, and persuasive content to discover and develop sophisticated ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.

Proficient – Uses appropriate and pertinent content to discover ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.

Basic – Uses appropriate and pertinent content but does not apply it toward discovering or developing ideas. Overall, content assists in shaping the written work.

Below Expectations – Uses content, though it may be unrelated or inappropriate to the topic. Content does not contribute toward the development of the written work and may distract the reader from its purpose.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Critical Thinking: Evidence
Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Employs persuasive and applicable information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.

Proficient – Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.

Basic – Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Below Expectations – Presents information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects to apply such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.50

Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 0.50

Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.

Basic – Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.

Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Page Requirement
Total: 0.50

Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient – Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations – Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Homework Sharks
Order NOW For A 10% Discount!
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Our Advantages

Plagiarism Free Papers

All our papers are original and written from scratch. We will email you a plagiarism report alongside your completed paper once done.

Free Revisions

All papers are submitted ahead of time. We do this to allow you time to point out any area you would need revision on, and help you for free.

Title-page

A title page preceeds all your paper content. Here, you put all your personal information and this we give out for free.

Bibliography

Without a reference/bibliography page, any academic paper is incomplete and doesnt qualify for grading. We also offer this for free.

Originality & Security

At Homework Sharks, we take confidentiality seriously and all your personal information is stored safely and do not share it with third parties for any reasons whatsoever. Our work is original and we send plagiarism reports alongside every paper.

24/7 Customer Support

Our agents are online 24/7. Feel free to contact us through email or talk to our live agents.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

We work around the clock to see best customer experience.

Pricing

Flexible Pricing

Our prces are pocket friendly and you can do partial payments. When that is not enough, we have a free enquiry service.

Communication

Admission help & Client-Writer Contact

When you need to elaborate something further to your writer, we provide that button.

Deadlines

Paper Submission

We take deadlines seriously and our papers are submitted ahead of time. We are happy to assist you in case of any adjustments needed.

Reviews

Customer Feedback

Your feedback, good or bad is of great concern to us and we take it very seriously. We are, therefore, constantly adjusting our policies to ensure best customer/writer experience.