Unit 5 Assignment – Conflict Resolution Policy
Unit 5 Assignment – Conflict Resolution Policy
Instructions
Your supervisor knows that you are in graduate school and currently learning about conflict resolution. You have told her that you want to move into more of a leadership role in your organization. To assist you in building your resume, she has asked you to develop a conflict resolution policy, procedures, and training for your organization.
This is a preliminary document so she wants you to keep it short. This paper should include:
Introduction to the topic of conflict
a brief discussion about what workplace conflict is and why a policy is important
policy and procedures for resolving conflict, and
a proposed outline for training topics.
Conclusion
Submit your assignment by Sunday at midnight.
This paper should:
Be approximately 4-5 pages long, double-spaced (1000-1200 words)
Include a title and reference page – not included in the page count
Exclude sources older than 5 years
Include 4-5 sources from the required readings and/or scholarly sources found from Herzing’s library. Your textbook may be used as one source.
Include an introductory paragraph and a conclusion
Submit your assignment by Sunday at midnight.
Estimated time to complete: 4 hours
Rubric
NU530 Unit 5 Assignment Conflict Resolution Policy
NU530 Unit 5 Assignment Conflict Resolution Policy
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic
NU530-CO1
10 pts
Level 5
Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant aspects of the topic.
9 pts
Level 4
Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses important and notable aspects of the topic.
8 pts
Level 3
Identifies a focused and manageable/doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic.
7 pts
Level 2
Identifies a topic that while manageable/doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic.
6 pts
Level 1
Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be manageable and doable.
0 pts
Level 0
Does not clearly identify a topic that is relative to the assignment.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views
PRICE-C; PRICE-R
20 pts
Level 5
Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
18 pts
Level 4
Examines in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
16 pts
Level 3
Explains in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
14 pts
Level 2
Relates information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches.
12 pts
Level 1
Relates information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.
0 pts
Level 0
Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDesign Process
NU530-CO1; PRICE-P
10 pts
Level 5
All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.
9 pts
Level 4
Most critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be analyzed from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.
8 pts
Level 3
Some critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.
7 pts
Level 2
Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.
6 pts
Level 1
Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.
0 pts
Level 0
The design of the paper is not based upon a clear methodology or framework.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
NU530-CO1; PRICE-I
35 pts
Level 5
Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
32 pts
Level 4
Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
28 pts
Level 3
Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
25 pts
Level 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.
21 pts
Level 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
0 pts
Level 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
NU530-CO1; PRICE-I
10 pts
Level 5
States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings.
9 pts
Level 4
States a conclusion that is a lo
