Nike Case Study Analysis
Nike Case Study Analysis
Nike: Spreading Out to Win the Race
Nike is indisputably a giant in the athletics industry. The Portland, Oregon, company is known worldwide for its products, none of which it actually makes. It has thrived by knowing how to stay small, focusing on core competencies, and outsourcing manufacturing.
But if you don’t make anything, what do you actually do? If you outsource everything, what’s left? A lot of brand recognition, as it turns out.
Behind the Swoosh
Nike continues to outpace the athletic shoe competition while spreading its brand through an ever-widening universe of sports equipment, apparel, and paraphernalia. The ever-present Swoosh graces everything from bumper stickers to sunglasses to high school sports uniforms. Nike products embody a love of sport, discipline, ambition, practice, and all other desirable traits of athleticism.
The company has cleverly kept its advertising agency nestled close to home, but has relied extensively on outsourcing many non-executive and back office responsibilities to reduce overhead. Nike is structured around its core competency in product design—not manufacturing. It has taken outsourcing to a new level, with sub-contractors producing all of its shoes.
Whoops
Although outsourcing production hasn’t hurt product quality, it has challenged Nike’s reputation for social responsibility, especially regarding work conditions and labor practices at some suppliers. In a move designed to turn critics into converts, Nike posts information on its website detailing every one of the hundreds of factories that it uses to make shoes, apparel, and other sporting goods. It released the data in conjunction with a comprehensive corporate responsibility report summarizing the environmental impact and the labor situations of its contract factories.
Nike also encourages designers to develop environmentally sustainable designs like the Nike Free, a lightweight running shoe that boosted sales dramatically. Nike’s Sustainable Business & Innovation Lab funds outside startups focused on alternative energies, more efficient approaches to manufacturing, and the promotion of healthy lifestyles.
Pesky Competition
Nike has so far balanced size and pressure to remain successful by leveraging a decentralized and networked organization structure. Individual business centers—such as research, production, and marketing—are free to focus on their core competencies without worrying about the effects of corporate bloat.
This company has found continued marketplace success by positioning itself not simply as a sneaker company but as a brand that fulfills the evolving needs of today’s athletes and athletes-at-heart. Will Nike continue to profit from its organization structure, or will it spread itself so thin that its competition has a chance to overtake it?
Source: Schermerhorn Jr., J.R., Bachrach, D.G. (2016) Nike: Spreading Out to Win the Race. In Exploring Management (Cases for Critical Thinking).
Case Analysis Questions
Answer the following in up to 350 words each.
- Describe the factors that drive Nike’s decision to stick with some form of network organizational structure rather than own its manufacturing operations.
Click here to enter text.
- Assess why Nike’s choice of a decentralized and networked organization structure worked well for them.
Click here to enter text.
- Summarize the current state of competition in this industry. Assess if Nike continuing to pull away from rivals, or if they are catching up.
Click here to enter text.
- Assess whether Nike’s organizational structure is still a major strength that contributes to its success, or if it is creating problems that will call for organizational design changes in the future.
Click here to enter text.
- Determine whether a matrix structure could improve performance for Nike.
Click here to enter text.
ANSWER
Nike Case Study Analysis
Nike: Spreading Out to Win the Race
Nike is indisputably a giant in the athletics industry. The Portland, Oregon, company is known worldwide for its products, none of which it actually makes. It has thrived by knowing how to stay small, focusing on core competencies, and outsourcing manufacturing.
But if you don’t make anything, what do you actually do? If you outsource everything, what’s left? A lot of brand recognition, as it turns out.
Behind the Swoosh
Nike continues to outpace the athletic shoe competition while spreading its brand through an ever-widening universe of sports equipment, apparel, and paraphernalia. The ever-present Swoosh graces everything from bumper stickers to sunglasses to high school sports uniforms. Nike products embody a love of sport, discipline, ambition, practice, and all other desirable traits of athleticism.
The company has cleverly kept its advertising agency nestled close to home, but has relied extensively on outsourcing many non-executive and back office responsibilities to reduce overhead. Nike is structured around its core competency in product design—not manufacturing. It has taken outsourcing to a new level, with sub-contractors producing all of its shoes.
Whoops
Although outsourcing production hasn’t hurt product quality, it has challenged Nike’s reputation for social responsibility, especially regarding work conditions and labor practices at some suppliers. In a move designed to turn critics into converts, Nike posts information on its website detailing every one of the hundreds of factories that it uses to make shoes, apparel, and other sporting goods. It released the data in conjunction with a comprehensive corporate responsibility report summarizing the environmental impact and the labor situations of its contract factories.
Nike also encourages designers to develop environmentally sustainable designs like the Nike Free, a lightweight running shoe that boosted sales dramatically. Nike’s Sustainable Business & Innovation Lab funds outside startups focused on alternative energies, more efficient approaches to manufacturing, and the promotion of healthy lifestyles.
Pesky Competition
Nike has so far balanced size and pressure to remain successful by leveraging a decentralized and networked organization structure. Individual business centers—such as research, production, and marketing—are free to focus on their core competencies without worrying about the effects of corporate bloat.
This company has found continued marketplace success by positioning itself not simply as a sneaker company but as a brand that fulfills the evolving needs of today’s athletes and athletes-at-heart. Will Nike continue to profit from its organization structure, or will it spread itself so thin that its competition has a chance to overtake it?
Source: Schermerhorn Jr., J.R., Bachrach, D.G. (2016) Nike: Spreading Out to Win the Race. In Exploring Management (Cases for Critical Thinking).
Case Analysis Questions
Answer the following in up to 350 words each.
- Describe the factors that drive Nike’s decision to stick with some form of network organizational structure rather than own its manufacturing operations.
The availability of cheap labor overseas countries which make Nike, helps them reduce the cost of production. The minimum wage in countries like China are considerably lower compared to the $10 an hour in America.
In addition, the risks associated with manufacturing their own product, like human resources damages like injury, unforeseeable losses, fires, among others, are considerably reduced through networking the organization’s production to other countries.
- Assess why Nike’s choice of a decentralized and networked organization structure worked well for them.
According to the article, Nike’s choice of decentralized and networked organization structure works to their advantage since they are all independent. With different networking, production, and researching centers, more effort is put into their perfection, without the worry of affecting one another. Through this form of specialization, the overall output is near perfection as a lot of effort is put into each individual centers.
- Summarize the current state of competition in this industry. Assess if Nike continuing to pull away from rivals, or if they are catching up.
The sportswear industry is competitive, with companies like Adidas and Under Amor posing as a threat to Nike (Pang, 2021). With the advancement of e-commerce, there is more access to a wide market through complex global supply chains. With Nike decentralizing their organization, they are able to access such markets quickly than their competitors, thus giving them an advantage over their competitors.
- Assess whether Nike’s organizational structure is still a major strength that contributes to its success or if it is creating problems that will call for organizational design changes in the future.
Nike’s organizational structure is still a major strength, as other competitors like Adidas are using the same decentralized and networked organization structure. Thus, more success will continue to be experienced as more and more companies continue to diversify their production efforts.
- Determine whether a matrix structure could improve performance for Nike.
A matric organization’s structure involves employees reporting to various department managers rather than a single manager overseeing the entire project (Bazigos, 2016). This would be an advantage to Nike as the structure promotes open channels of communication between different departments. This will promote the exploitation of different talents within the company easily, thereby increasing their networking, research, and production qualities.
References
Bazigos, M., & Harter, J. (2016). Revisiting the matrix organization.
Pang, B. (2021, October). The Integration of Technology and Culture of Sportswear Products under the Trend of Start-ups and Innovation. In 7th International Conference on Management, Education, Information and Control (MEICI 2017) (pp. 282-286). Atlantis Press.
