continue from the last one that you did for me
HIS 200: Historical Analysis Essay
Name
Department/Institution
Course
Instructor
Due Date
HIS 200: Historical Analysis Essay
School Desegregation in Boston
The desegregation of schools in Boston is a historical event that started after the 1974 ruling by federal judge Arthur Garrity, ordering all Boston public schools to start the process of busing to ensure that schools in the region were desegregated. Judge Garrity’s decision was the first key victory for Black students and parents since Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. The desegregation of schools in Boston is an event that is significant for immigrant communities since it resulted in law changes that began the process of equal treatment of students from different backgrounds in the educational setting. The event paved the way for equality, enabling African American children to attend the same schools as their white counterparts without being deemed unfit or unteachable based on their color or background.
Causes of the Event
Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, White and Black students would go to different schools (Blum, 2019). White schools had many classrooms, with a small number of children in every class, permanently employed teachers, and access to all the necessary learning resources and materials. Black schools had overcrowded classrooms, with children sitting outside and learning materials scarce. A huge portion of care and resources were allocated to White schools since it was assumed that they had more students. The effect of the segregation of schools was that Black students were harmed, as they were provided with inferior educational opportunities and learning resources. The Black residents and parents across the country began opposing the segregation of schools, fighting for education equality for students (Blum, 2019).
In Boston, Black parents wanted their children to attend schools where there were adequate resources for proper educational growth. They wanted schools that had enough classrooms and up-to-date books and learning materials. They wanted good school buildings and schools where adequate funding was allocated for purposes of acquiring books and equipment used for teaching and learning (Delmont, 2016). Activists and parents were fighting for more than just having Black and White students sitting next to each other in class. In Boston, more than eighty percent of the Black-elementary-school students attended majority-black schools, which were overcrowded. The average per-pupil spending in the 1950s for White students was $340 while that of Black students was only $240 (Delmont, 2016). While such data was not enough to persuade the Boston School Committee that segregation existed in the region, continuous protests and activism ultimately resulted in the 1974 decision of federal judge Arthur Garrity.
The Course of the Event
The 1954 US Supreme Court decision in Oliver Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. (Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 1954) was the beginning of the journey towards the desegregation of schools in Boston. The decision found that schools that are separate for black and white students were illegal and there was a need to integrate public schools. However, the public schools in Boston continued becoming unbalanced through the 1970s. As a result of the continued inaction, a group of Black parents filed a suit against the Boston School Committee on March 15, 1972, in the case of Tallulah Morgan et al. v. James Hennigan et al. (Patterson & Freehling, 2001), claiming that the school committee was deliberately keeping schools segregated. On the 21st of June, 1974, Judge Arthur Garrity ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, the Black parents, ordering the Boston School Committee to submit a desegregation plan for public schools. The judge started the enforcement of the plan developed, dictating that the “racial balance in all citywide schools shall be reflective of the total student population in the Boston Public School system” (UMB, n.d.). This eventually became the first phase of the desegregation plan, and involved student transportation, redistricting, and the formation of parent committees.
Consequences of the Event
The decision of Judge Garrity and the integration plan developed resulted in fierce criticism among some of the residents of Boston. Attendance of the students enrolled in Boston school districts dropped significantly immediately after the plan was implemented, with those opposed to the ruling attacking the judge (UMB, n.d.). From September 1975, the school attendance zones and grade structures were revised. Construction of new schools began, with the transfer policy being controlled. Black and White students were allowed to attend any school in their district, where the enrollment process was carried out by the school committee. They could also attend a citywide school of their choice upon qualification (UMB, n.d.). Local universities, colleges, and community groups were linked to schools after the implementation of the desegregation plan. Eventually, parents and students accepted forced desegregation and the racial tensions in Boston lessened.
Historical Evidence and Conclusion
The changes that were implemented after the ruling of Judge Garrity in Tallulah Morgan et al. v. James Hennigan et al. became the foundation upon which modern schools were built, where Black and White students attend classes together (Delmont, 2016; UMB, n.d.). To date, Black and White students continue to enjoy educational equality, attending school together and accessing learning resources without discrimination. The decision formed the foundation for the racial balance of schools across the country.
References
Blum, L. (2019). Reflections on Brown vs. Board of Education and School Integration Today. The Harvard Review of Philosophy.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/347/483/
Delmont, M. (2016, March 29). The Lasting Legacy of the Busing Crisis. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/03/the-boston-busing-crisis-was-never-intended-to-work/474264/
Patterson, J. T., & Freehling, W. W. (2001). Brown v. Board of Education: A civil rights milestone and its troubled legacy. Oxford University Press.
UMB. (n.d.). Research Guides: Selected Resources Documenting School Desegregation: Overview of School Desegregation Research Guide. https://umb.libguides.com/desegregation.
Our Advantages
Plagiarism Free Papers
All our papers are original and written from scratch. We will email you a plagiarism report alongside your completed paper once done.
Free Revisions
All papers are submitted ahead of time. We do this to allow you time to point out any area you would need revision on, and help you for free.
Title-page
A title page preceeds all your paper content. Here, you put all your personal information and this we give out for free.
Bibliography
Without a reference/bibliography page, any academic paper is incomplete and doesnt qualify for grading. We also offer this for free.
Originality & Security
At Homework Sharks, we take confidentiality seriously and all your personal information is stored safely and do not share it with third parties for any reasons whatsoever. Our work is original and we send plagiarism reports alongside every paper.
24/7 Customer Support
Our agents are online 24/7. Feel free to contact us through email or talk to our live agents.
Try it now!
How it works?
Follow these simple steps to get your paper done
Place your order
Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.
Proceed with the payment
Choose the payment system that suits you most.
Receive the final file
Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.
Our Services
We work around the clock to see best customer experience.
Pricing
Our prces are pocket friendly and you can do partial payments. When that is not enough, we have a free enquiry service.
Communication
Admission help & Client-Writer Contact
When you need to elaborate something further to your writer, we provide that button.
Deadlines
Paper Submission
We take deadlines seriously and our papers are submitted ahead of time. We are happy to assist you in case of any adjustments needed.
Reviews
Customer Feedback
Your feedback, good or bad is of great concern to us and we take it very seriously. We are, therefore, constantly adjusting our policies to ensure best customer/writer experience.